Wednesday, June 30, 2004

BAD JEW

With apologies to my loved ones, I have to come clean and announce that I have transgressed against the Jewish people.

I have added Signs to my Netflix queue. Even though it stars Mel Gibson.

I'm very sorry for how this news will affect my family, most of all. I hope that the Jewish community will see fit to leave them out of any ensuing Jewish media tornadoes: this decision is mine alone.

And mom and dad: I hope you know that this does not signal my desire to increase the fortune of Mr. Gibson. I merely wished to see M. Night Shyamalan's movie before The Village is released next month. I didn't see it in the theater, but now, it's time.

This also does not signal a complete rejection of traditional Judaism. I'm still looking for a Jewish guy to build a future with, and I'm still a member in good standing of my synagogue. This is purely a pop cultural choice that has no impact on my future as an American Jew.

If this has in any way disappointed you, I sincerely apologize. It was not my intent to offend, but we all make choices in life that affect us first and others second. This is my choice.



Tuesday, June 29, 2004

WHO IS THE "HALF-BLOOD PRINCE"?

So, CNN announced the title of J.K. Rowling's next Harry Potter book: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

So the question open for discussion and endless speculation is, who exactly is the Half-Blood Prince?

CNN says that the HBP is neither Voldemort nor HP. My friend Dan suggests it might be my friend Jim, who's leaving for Israel Wednesday despite many pleas from many Jewish women. (Could explain the hasty retreat.) But then again, maybe Dan's saying that to throw us off the fact that Dan himself is the HBP.

At first, I thought this must mean that the prince in question is only half-wizard, like Hermione--this could mean a long-lost relative for good old H. But then I remembered, in HP lingo, someone who is half-wizard and half-Muggle is called a Mudblood.

The real question is, what does the word "prince" mean in the HP-universe? I don't remember royalty being a factor in the previous books.

And then I remembered! I'm 33, and a full-time freelancer. And I need to get some work done. Enough of this narishkeit. I turn it over to you for discussion.

TODAY I'LL MEET THE BOY I'M GONNA MARRY...

When life brings you what you want without your having to ask for it, that's what I like to call "pigeon-shit" karma.

My editor at the Jewish Week asked me to cover tonight's finals of the "Funniest Amateur Jewish Standup Comic in New York" competition, which I was planning to attend anyway. My piece is about 400 words, which isn't long at all, but it's getting front-of-the-book prominence, and is going to contain highlights of the show, as well as a brief interview with the winner. As much as I'd love to see a woman win, because women don't get enough props in stand-up, I'd also love to see a man win. Specifically, my man.

If there's any romantic justice in the world, my bashert (my meant-to-be, or as Friend Phoebe would have said, my "lobster") will be there tonight, too. And he's gonna win the competition, and an interview with me. During the interview, he'll be all aglow, energized by the thrill of victory and the presence of a beautiful, hilarious woman. (Just to clarify, that's me.) I'll ask him for his number, in case I have any questions that I need to follow up on, and he'll ask me for mine, just because. Under the dimmed lights at the comedy club, romance will bloom, a love sprung from laughter and nurtured by a steady humor.

Plus, when I submit the article, another paycheck. That's a "win-win" scenario. I'd say that was worth taking a piece of poop in the arm.

WELCOME TO PLANET GIRTH

Oh boy. Slate published a review of the new commercial for hot dogs. You've seen it, where that guy is roasting his wieners on a grill, and talks about girth for what seems like an hour; he calls his franks "girthy," and that he loves the way that sounds.

Let's be "frank." It does sound funny. But it also sounds sexual. Slate's Seth Stevenson did a Lexis-Nexis search for the word "girth":

A quick Nexis search shows that "girthy" made it into print only 23 times in the past year. Three times it refers to ears of corn (it appears to be commercial farming jargon). The New York Times employs it to describe an opera singer (of course they do). And oddly, it appears in four separate stories in Guitar Player magazine (each time, the word refers either to guitar necks or guitar sounds; all four stories are by a writer named Art Thompson—who either had an ongoing bet with friends, or was in a real bad adjective rut).

But in modern usage, girth is used almost exclusively to describe one thing. If you're curious, Seth Stevenson recommends that you do NOT do a web seach for the word. Believe me, you'll find that the usage is almost always penile.

Hot dogs. A.K.A. wieners. That plump when you cook 'em. (Don't we all.) And in addition to their phallic shape and their tendency to grow when you get them hot, now they're girthy. I know the advertising mantra of "sex sells," but does it always have to?

Enjoy your Fourth of July barbecues, everyone!

Monday, June 28, 2004

CAMP MOVIES WE LOVE

At least for me, there are certain movies whose themes, characters and situations evoke the themes, characters and situations that I experienced (or wish I had experienced) at Camp. Here are my favorites: make sure to weigh in with your opinions and additions to the list.

Indian Summer (1993)
My favorite, most closely resembles the activities and personalities of Camp Ramah in the Berkshires, where I spent summers. The story of a camp director (Alan Arkin) who invites some of his favorite campers back for a week of Camp-style relaxation. Elizabeth McGovern's sarcastic and spunky, Bill Paxton's irreverent and incorrigible, Diane Lane is luminous, as usual, and Kevin Pollak's hilarious. (I wish I had gone to camp with Kevin Pollak. And that we were married. But that's another post.)

Camp (2003)
A touching and hilarious summer at a performing arts camp. This is what Camp would look like if every day were Yom Machazeh (the day when you rehearse the play ALL DAY until that evening's performance) and every peulah (activity) was drama. Starring a cast of extremely talented unknowns. My favorite scene (don't worry, I won't spoil it): the debate over ethnic casting.

Wet Hot American Summer (2001)
Counselors try not to work too hard as they provide minimal care for their charges and frolic in the heat of summer. Celebrity counselors include Janeane Garofalo, David Hyde Pierce and Paul Rudd.

Little Darlings (1980)
Tatum O'Neal. Kristy MacNichol. Matt Dillon. Add the plot of "Losin' It" and you've got Little Darlings. Look for a blonde, extremely young Cynthia Nixon in a supporting role. And maybe someone can explain to me why all the campers in the same bunk seem to be different ages.

Meatballs (1979)
Bill Murray. That's all the information I have. Which is good, because that's all the information you need.

What are your favorites and why?

Sunday, June 27, 2004

PLOP

I suppose I had a good run. I mean, I had been living in NYC for about a decade, and this had never happened to me before.

It began, as such things do, somewhere up there--out of the literal blue, it fell at extreme velocity, until it hit target with a plop and a barely discernible splatter.

A pigeon had pooped in the great above, but it had long flown away by the time its wretched refuse was expelled from the kingdom of avian body, into the atmosphere, a rapidly accelerating gift to the world that became a smear on my arm.

Attempts to remove the greyish-white matter from my forearm were valiant and varied: scraping my arm against a building on West End Avenue, ripping off a piece of a street lamp flyer for a "man with a van," using someone's discarded deli napkin.

The more I tried, the more the excrement became part of my epidermis. To the world, it looked like a small smudge, a pieces of shmutz easily removed, once home, with vanilla-scented anti-bacterial soap. But I knew it was a metaphor for an internal life, externalized and personified.

A bright side to being a pigeon toilet: this is supposed to mean good luck is on the way. I'm looking forward to it. Because otherwise, it is merely literal: a crock of shit.

MOORE TO THINK ABOUT

Walking into the theater, I thought I was prepared. I had just seen Mark Hamill walking his dogs. They were small, fluffy and white, as if clouds had transmogrified into canines. Democrats had a table set up outside, and kept asking us "Do you want to help defeat President Bush?" as they hit us up for funds.

But walking out after seeing Fahrenheit 9/11, a masterful if incredibly disturbing film, I realized that there is no such thing as prepared. Just as I was not prepared for Gore to win the presidency and yet not be inaugurated. Just as no one was prepared for 9/11. Just as hearing statistics of war losses is never the same as seeing the pain on a mother's face when she learns her son or daughter's been killed in a land far from home.

After the movie, which was replete with incredibly appropriate musical selections and film documentation of our President's bizarre facial tics and dulcet intonations, I felt my heart racing. I stood on line for the ladies' room, and felt an exacerbated sense of frustration, not at the line, which was considerable, but at the film and its ramifications. My blood pressure and my dander were up. We were riled, all of us. And we felt helpless.

The film reminded us all that democracy is necessarily limited; our government cannot reveal to us all the information it has. By the same token, Michael Moore clearly made a film that represents his opinion, his version of the truth. So, whose truth is truthiest? There's no way to know.

It's a bit shy of conspiracy theory, which I partially embrace due to my foundational entertainment diet of Oliver Stone films and nine seasons of the X-Files, but I am at the point where I'm not sure how much of an impact individuals can make on the electoral process. Yes, I'll vote, but I'm not in love with Kerry either. I don't know what the answer is.

I'm trying to re-calibrate my mind, to bring myself back to the time before the movie, when my ignorance was my bliss, when I could watch Luke Skywalker become Luke Dogwalker. And I'm having trouble.

Friday, June 25, 2004

MADONNA, ROSH HASHANAH; ROSH HASHANAH, MADONNA

Do you believe this? Madonna and Jewish-related subjects: This is like a runaway train. This Rosh Hashanah, Madonna's going to Israel with a group of 100 kabbalah students.

Given, I have several comments.

Firstly, who are the other 99 students who are in a Kabbalah class with Madonna? Can you imagine being on the bus with her as the group travels around the country? She'd be talking with her newish-Jewish accent inflected by Michigan via London, and flaunting her Jean-Paul Gauthier wardrobe, insisting that people call her Esther (my name, need I remind you) and practicing the guttural "khaf" sound and trilling her "resh"es.

My other comment pertains to M's accommodations while she visits the Holy Land. According to the article above, "Madonna will stay in an out-of-the-way guesthouse and avoid fans and TV cameras so that she'll be able to focus on her cabala studies." Let me state for the record, unequivocally, that this will never happen. How out-of-the-way could any guesthouse be in a state the size of New Jersey? And as far as privacy's concerned, unless the guesthouse is a Mossad safe house, there's no way her location's going to remain a secret. In fact, I have so many relatives in Israel that I bet that by September, I'll know where she's staying.

Stay tuned in the weeks ahead, as Madonna continues to raid the beachhead of Judaism and pillages selected customs and beliefs for adoption.

Thursday, June 24, 2004

IN THE SNOOD...

For many Jews, a snood is a sign of a married woman's affiliation with an Orthodoxy that's traditional enough to demand that married women cover their hair in public, and modern enough to not insist on a wig. Now, Gawker reports that Chloe Sevigny is wearing one:

on saturday i saw chloe sevigny browsing the non-fiction section in the union square barnes and noble. she was surprisingly subdued in white overall shorts and a white tank. of course it wouldn't be chloe without something bizarre, she had on a white crocheted snood. i was in a rush, couldn't see what she was buying.

Since she was photographed shopping on a Saturday, my guess is that this does NOT mean that Chloe's gone the way of Madonna in embracing Jewish religious paraphernalia.

What's a snood? Click here to find out.

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

GUEST POST: MADONNA ON MOORE

[Ladies and gentlemen...Madonna! Umm, I mean, Esther. But don't get confused, this is TAFKAM (the artist formerly known as Madonna), not Esther/me, the proprietress of this blog. Oh, whatever. Here's Madge:]

Greetings, my loyal fans. I encourage you all to open your hearts to Kabbalah; let it inspire you to see Fahrenheit 9/11, a film by my good friend Michael Moore (Kabbalah name: Immanuel), whose name sounds even more soothing when I inflect it with my newly-acquired clipped British accent.

Guy (Kabbalah name: Guy) and I are appalled by the government's behaviour during this cruel, cruel war. This is why we live in England, so we do not have to get involved in actually changing American foreign policy. As I critiqued during my underappreciated rap song "American Life," American society obsessed with money and status:

I got a lawyer and a manager, an agent and a chef
Three nannies, an assistant and a driver and a jet
A trainer and a butler and a bodyguard or five
A gardener and a stylist, do you think I’m satisfied


I appeal to your sense of morality and compassion. Vote for Michael Moore and against capitalism. Raise your voice and please buy my children's books and an "Esther Rocks" t-shirt for $85, proceeds above cost will benefit children. Specifically, children named Lola (Kabbalah name: Liora) and Rocco (Kabbalah name: Reuel).

May Kabbalah bless you in your spiritual voyage toward discovery of the Immanent. Vendor kiosks are located at all the major exits.

OH, THAT WACKY RELIGION

Lots of (non-Jewish) religious news today.

Firstly, Pope says nope to Ope. And by this I mean, JP2 has got a book coming out in September and refuses to hit the talk show/promotion circuit. (Who does he think he is, THE POPE??) He'll never be "an Oprah book" now...if he wants his publication to be a success beyond the jillions of Catholics and Pope-heads (which is my invented, non-respectful term for the equivalent of the Pope's groupies), he's going to have to take a lesson from Shmuely Boteach and do some promotion. Might I suggest an on-air interview with Air America's Al Franken or Janeane Garofalo?

Secondly, we've got the Archbishop of Canterbury in talks to guest on an episode of The Simpsons. He's a big fan, apparently, and says that the show is "generally on the side of the angels" and that he notices similarities between himself and Homer Simpson. The famous Olde English Canterbury Tales aside, does Canterbury dominate enough Nielsen points to merit an appearance by its Archbishop? Dude, where's Shmuely Boteach's guest spot?

[Special bonus for you guys who check out the second story: Beliefnet has Simpson quizzes. "How well do you know Apu?" "How much do you know about Ned Flanders?" etc...]

Which religious figure would you most like to see do a guest star appearance on The Simpsons? Create the wish list here: state your chosen religious figure and why, and maybe I'll forward the list to the producers of The Simpsons for their consideration.

Tuesday, June 22, 2004

SPAM FICTION WORKSHOP

[This entry utilizes mostly words sent to me in spam messages. I've added some prepositions and verbs, but all of the nouns and most of the adjectives came from spam...]

At six o'clock day began to break; and, with the first glimmer of light, the electric light of the narwhal disappeared into the truth that is the papillary royal penthouse.

In these simultaneous observations they thought themselves justified in estimating the minimum length of the mammal at more than three hundred and fifty feet, as the Shannon and Helvetia were of smaller dimensions than it, though they measured three hundred feet over all.

To decorate his bricklaying, Coach Gregory was the only prey alive on the planet. Bryan Krause, wingman to Fantasia, descended the imperceptible gangplank, like an anglo a la carte, on the way to the perth temple to commit a blemish against Ernestine.

But to assassinate streptomycin would cause uproarious apathy; the megalomaniac warlike asylum, known in certain circles as "nobelium sky," had a henchman paying airfare to the quarryman; he would call Hearst ashy, as the sensor invoked Persian playwrights.

The conservator's powder left him with blackfeet, yearning to strengthen his palate; to circumcise Calypso.

Monday, June 21, 2004

CONTEMPLATION

[Warning: Tough issues ahead.]

Watching Bridget Jones's Diary on TBS. Am laughing and crying and having dreadfully dirty thoughts about Colin Firth, all at the same time. (The way he simmers, never actually smiling, but somehow conveying all with his eyes, brow, profile...) Even his big girlie-man fight scene with Hugh Grant ("It's Raining Men" pulses in the background as they fight until both of them are bloodied and sweaty) leaves me all keyed up, and feeling my loneliness reassert itself.

Colin aside (blasphemy), the one thing that's really affecting me is the scene where Bridget cooks dinner for her friends to commemorate her 33rd birthday. There's a resonance there that is especially strong for me this year. I know what that's like. So hard to spend year after year planning one's own birthday, trying to banish the loneliness in advance before it ever arrives on my doorstep.

The truth: I'm tired of it already. I want what I have never had, the companionship, the stability, the support--I even want the heartbreak that pushes my friends to the emotional brink, because it meant that even in those failed relationships, there was a compelling strength. There are times when I am even envious of the pain. That's how bad it can be.

Birthdays seem as fitting a time as any for reflection. But every year, the pressure's on: what, who with, where, when. But what always gets me is the why and the how long.

Why it always seems like no matter how many friends surround me in celebration, I'm always walking home alone. How long it's been since I had anyone else plan anything for my birthday. Why I always throw these huge parties, and enjoy them, but somehow still resent the fact that I'm the one who has to plan everything in celebration of myself, which seems so self-indulgent, conceited, and artificial. How long is it going to be before He shows up? Why is it taking so long?

I love my friends. The turnout for my party was amazing, a veritable "This is Your Life," featuring cameos by camp friends and work friends, shul friends and new friends from the wonderful world of blogging. I felt very lucky; with a few drinks in me, "lucky" even felt like "euphoric."

But euphoria fades. As happy as we may feel surrounded by friends and alcohol on our birthdays, on a daily basis, we single people walk around with the world on our shoulders. We lack a security of the most basic kind. Even if we are happy to the extent that the solitary life allows, with our professional status or our freedom or our independence, we harbor a darkness that we cannot show to others. We have to keep our happy faces front and center, to woo the unseen future suitors of our lives. We banish depression to the netherworld and wear black-tie happiness at the weddings of our friends, as we shelve our feelings and our doubt about our own single stories ending happily.

And on our birthdays, and sometimes for days after, we feel the aging process wearing on us. We look to others to lift our spirits. When our spirits are up, the day is no challenge. But when night falls, we fight to submerge the darkness.

Speaking of darkness, I have to say there's nothing scarier than suddenly seeing a centipede crawling up your wall while you're watching a Stephen King movie (Salem's Lot--vampires, but no souls, like my Angel). No sleep for me tonight.

BLACKOUT DID NOT RESULT IN BABY BOOM

Or, at least that's what About.com reports.

Personally, if I'd had the opportunity, I might have engaged in a little blackout activity of my own. But alas, instead of being in the arms of someone I loved (or could learn to love for about half an hour), I was sweating my ass off in the subway, trapped with a bunch of silent strangers, unsure if the world above us was crumbling or descending into chaos. And yes, I scanned the car, but there was no one in it even suitable for TV-movie-end-of-the-world snogging. It was an appalling display, on all levels.

As the anniversary approaches, I'm going to try to sell my account of the blackout from the subterranean perspective to a publication of some sort. (If you know anyone who's interested, let me know.) But if no one snaps it up, look for the story here in August.

Sunday, June 20, 2004

MADONNANTHOLOGY

For your convenience, and in light of recent press releases and interviews published by the Material Mom, I offer my Madonnanthology, my Immaculate Collection, of blog entries about Madonna and Me.

As you can see, we've had a spotty history, starting off strong, and slowly disintegrating. The closer she tries to come in appropriating shades of me through my tradition and my name, the more I push away; she's seen the movie Single White Female too many times and is trying to play psychotic Jennifer Jason Leigh to my trusting Bridget Fonda...(Feels like I'm going to lose my mind! She just keeps on pushing my love over the borderline.)

The saga began, as sagas often do, with a dinner invitation.

April 14
YOU'RE INVITED TO SHABBAT DINNER WITH THE MATERIAL GIRL

April 20
ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

April 22
YET ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

May 4
STILL ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

June 16
QUIEN ES LA NINA (WHO'S THAT GIRL?)

June 17
CALL ME MADONNA

June 18
BECOMING ESTHER: THE MADONNA HAIKUS

Will there be more, or is the media at last oversaturated with reportage of this story? How long will this frenzy over the name change stay in vogue? Will I be forced to get into the groove of being shadowed by an aging pop star? Perhaps I'll have to open my heart to the possibility of a writing holiday from this subject matter; perhaps on an isla bonita somewhere, a lucky star will shine on me, and my name will be my own to cherish again.

Wow, sounds like a prayer.

Friday, June 18, 2004

MY OWN PRIVATE GOOGLEPLEX

[Believe it or not, this is a non-Madonna related post. The names have been changed, but the story is real. I used the name Dennis because I don’t know anyone with that name, and for the joke payoff/Angel reference embedded in paragraph four. It’s my blog, and I’ll set up jokes if I want to.]

In the beginning, there was Dennis. Not precisely at the beginning of everything, but certainly at the birth of the city girl I’ve since become. We met in college, dating only briefly during the fall of my senior year. By spring, our connection was gone. I was never sure why it faded, and it did somewhat darken my last months in school.

Nearly two years later, we crossed paths again, in one of those Hollywood-style-magic moments, in the randomness of Grand Central Station; as endless, hurried people filed through subway turnstiles, the two of us stood fixed, talking as an hour flew by. Neither of us had a pen, but I had a lipstick, so our exchange of phone numbers fell into cliché. We reconnected, and then reconnected.

Amid a dozen phone calls of flirtation and chatter, and a handful of dates in October, each of them more intense than the next, lasting several hours each, it seemed like…not a relationship, but a something. There was even an implication that we’d be spending New Year’s Eve together in the big city. When we were together there was an unbelievable intensity…more of a flashbulb, briefly bright, then not so much burnt out as vanished. It never had a chance to develop into love, of the roaring, epic variety, but we laughed a lot, and I still believe that there were true, pure moments when neither one of us wanted to be with anyone else. In my younger, less experienced days, that feeling was like the generic version of the brand name love.

One late December night, he didn’t pick me up for our date. I assumed that something had happened to him, and left him several messages. (Otherwise, why wouldn’t he call?) But he didn’t call. And when the Phantom Dennis vanished, there was no smoke lingering in the air, nor ash lying at my feet, just an absence where an undefined, potential something used to be. My ego was bruised, but mostly, I just missed his company.

That was the week before New Year’s, 1994. Since then, not a word. Just the paranoia of living in the same city, knowing that despite the statistical unlikelihood of running into an ex in a city of millions, it’s bound to happen. After all, it had happened to us once before. Did that increase or decrease our odds of randomly seeing each other again? I thought I spied him on the street, heard his voice, saw his jacket on a guy his height and build, saw a man with a goatee; it didn’t matter whether it was really him or not. It could have been. And my face flushed, as if I had done something wrong, and I ran from any potential confrontation. We never spoke again.

For years, when a rare dating prospect sailed onto the horizon, it was a longstanding joke among my friends: since Dennis and I hadn’t officially broken up, how did I know we weren’t still together? And if we were still together and I started seeing other men, wouldn’t that be cheating?

I heard through the grapevine that he had moved to Boston. (At that point, I was pretty sure I was free to see other people.) I’d never know anything more about him. It was the end.

And then there was Google.

I resisted the temptation for several years—before this year, it had never occurred me to do the Internet equivalent of sending out detectives to comb the web and potentially provide me with insight into someone who had removed himself from my life. If he had wanted me to know about his post-me existence, he would have called. Clearly, the phantom wanted no part of me.

But then, suddenly, I realized the decade-mark was approaching. Nine years after our inconclusive parting, curiosity reasserted itself loudly, and I couldn’t stop myself: I sent out an veritable Googleplex of unknown spies to plumb the breadth and width of the Internet and flesh out the enigma of nine missing years.

One simple search yielded the information I sought: a near-complete profile, in the form of his professional resume. A roadmap of everywhere he’d been, geographically (Massachusetts), spiritually (Buddhism), academically (clinical psychology). And at the top, gleaming like neon, was Temptation personified, an unholy Grail: an email address.

Over three days in November, I created a comprehensive chronicle of the life I had lived over the last near-decade, providing him with the type of information about me that I had uncovered about him, translating my bulleted resume into prose, so we’d be informationally even. It was the kind of email I periodically get from an old classmate who finds my writing on the Internet—just touching base, keeping it neutral, friendly, curious.

I kept it in my “drafts” folder for three weeks, never really knowing if I intended to send it. What was the point, really, of dredging the riverbed of history and trying to find meaning amidst the mud? It wasn’t in pursuit of romance rekindled; I never believed Dennis was right for me. He was a vegetarian, for God’s sake. (Speaking of God, our theological differences were stark, to the resume-revealed extent that while I worked at the Jewish Theological Seminary, he attended summer programs at a Buddhist seminary in Nepal.) I knew there was a better fit out there somewhere for both of us.

But after 9/11, when men and women all over the United States checked in with their exes, trying to reconnect with the people in their past, and in the process, to reconnect with a more stable emotional state, I heard nothing from him. I knew he was living in Boston, studying the human mind. But it always kind of bothered me that he never tried to find out where I had been on that day. More proof that our destinies were separate strands. He wasn’t for me. But I still wanted to know more.

I had no real hope that he’d respond. But hope’s feathers kept itching me, like dermatitis or wool, or like his assertive facial hair used to irritate my sensitive skin during our intense makeout sessions. In the end, I sent the email out of writer’s curiosity. I had to, more as a communicative, sensitive person extending a hand of friendship, than an ex-something’s madness. (But in retrospect, my disclaimer that the letter was “not from some deranged stalker” might have struck him as slightly alarming. Oops.)

However eternal my catlike curiosity and persistent hope sprang, it was for nothing. New Year’s Eve week 1994 or 2003, no difference. No response. Now that was the Dennis I remembered.

With 2004, a new year, a fresh start. But before bidding the memory a final, fond farewell and banishing it to memory and experience, I indulged in one goodbye Google. Accidentally leaving his middle initial out of the search, I found a new webpage that I hadn’t seen before. This more comprehensive homepage revealed that, during the month of November, while I was moving paragraphs and phrases around, crafting and redrafting my email to a man from my past, Dennis was moving straight ahead with his future. By the time I finally sent the email in December, he and his wife (Jane) were undoubtedly on their honeymoon. I pictured their return to overstuffed email accounts and the unceremonious deletion of messages from anyone they didn’t know…or perhaps Dennis’s dramatic “you won’t believe this, honey” reading of my email to his new bride, as she teases her devoted husband about the trail of broken hearts he has clearly left in his wake over the years. But I recognize that it ultimately doesn’t matter what they think of me. This search was never really about Dennis, and it certainly wasn’t about Jane. It was about me.

I’m not sure I believe that some kind of cosmic energy had him bob to the surface of my consciousness in November and December, as he was moving on with his life, prompting me to move ahead with mine. And after taking such care with each word in that email, I don’t know if he ever even saw it. Even if he did, I doubt I’ll ever hear from him. But at least now, I have the closure I deserved so long ago.

I cannot guarantee that curiosity will not prompt a future return to the website, to view photos from Dennis and Jane’s wedding. But our breakup is now official--effective immediately, I’m dating other people again. Guilt-free, and somehow lighter, freed from the Googleplex and emancipated from the ballast of the unresolved.

BECOMING ESTHER: THE MADONNA HAIKUS

Becoming Esther
takes more than holy red strings
and press releases

Material Girl
to Biblical heroine
is a long strange trip

Kabbalah water
From a hundred sacred springs
Won't help her find peace

Becoming Esther
For self or for children's sake
Clarifies nothing

Lola and Rocco
Are a joke at Hebrew school
As mom goes haimish

Guy wears a kippah
and tries on new religions
But nothing quite fits

Becoming Esther
Be she queen or freelancer
The life draws her in

"Kabbalah is mine,"
Madonna clutches it close
True blue, like a prayer.

Thursday, June 17, 2004

CALL ME MADONNA

Madonna says, "Call me Esther."

I say, "Call me Madonna."

So tedious to have my name be the focus of so much media attention, and yet not be the beneficiary of that attention. Must contact my agent and identify ways to benefit from this media onslaught as Madonna tries to encroach on my life.

Wednesday, June 16, 2004

QUIEN ES LA NINA? (WHO'S THAT GIRL?)

Dear Madonna,

Who's that girl? Mom, Mystic, Material Girl? It's like I don't even know you anymore.

I remember when we first began. Didn't know how lost I was, until I found you. And you made me feel shiny and new. You were burning up, burning up with your love of Judaism, and you asked me questions till you were true blue in the face.

I answered the best I could. I issued invitations to Shabbat dinner, to which you never responded. You asked me about Kabbalah, and I told you what little I knew. I remember how the parks of New York used to be our playground. It used to be the place we ran to, whenever we were in need of a friend. Lourdes and Rocco loved our Shabbat afternoon forays to Riverside Park for lunch, and then our walk over to Central Park, where we scoped out eligible ex-yeshiva boys for me; you were always so good at identifying the "yeshiva boys gone wild," it was a talent, sheer and true.

When you asked me about the biblical significance of my name, I told you. I had no idea that "the Mother of Reinvention" was about to reinvent herself as me. Or at least, as an extreme sort of "The Swan"-like Madge-Esther hybrid.

I know you envy my freelancer's lifestyle, wherein I splurge on 1.5 liters of Diet Coke when I'm having a good income week. I know you harbor a secret desire to work for Jewish nonprofit institutions. And I know Guy won't let you switch careers and move back to New York, where you, as an artist, began. I know that's what that weird accent of yours is about: the quest for identity. I know that's the reason for your endless production of Kabbalah-related children's books, because you desperately want the chance to start over.

But be careful as you "attach yourself to the energy of a new name." Your Judaism is not my Judaism. In fact, your Judaism isn't even my Judaism's Kabbalah. You've been swallowed by the L.A. incarnation of the Kabbalah Center, and they're not any kind of Jewish that I recognize. You pray every day, but to what? In what language and using whose words?

Madge, this is my last letter. I beg of you: take some time off from the Kabbalah Center. Study with a real rabbi; although I know you'd never describe yourself as conservative, in terms of rabbis, Conservative's probably your best bet. I can recommend a few people, if you're really interested in learning about Judaism, and what Kabbalah really is.

But in all likelihood, you're not really interested. What you needed was a big strong hand to lift you to a higher ground; The Kabbalah Center came along at a time when you were looking for a values structure for your family, and you grasped at it, maybe without even thinking about what it was.

As you prepare to release your next children's book, I am preparing to release you from my life. I can't be party to your superficial minings of the more elusive elements of my religious tradition. Find yourself a new Jew guru. I'm done.

I wish you happiness, that you may truly find it somewhere beyond the cash value of it all, and the spirituality you've been craving ever since childhood. But remember the keys to spirituality: Life is a mystery. Everyone must stand alone. But then, you hear someone call your name and it feels like home.

Esther


Thanks, Karol, for bringing this latest development to my attention.

HUGH JACKMAN

Got your attention, didn't I?

Well, I got a piece of spam this morning that used the same technique. Then, thinking it unlikely that Hugh had tracked down my email address and was calling to thank me for my tepid review of Van Helsing, I looked at the subject header. I'm reprinting the choice elements of the email's contents, courtesy of Outlook's preview pane. (Never open spam, kids! It's potentially full of viruses, promises of nudity, and is undoubtedly full of typos and incorrect grammar, see below...)

HEADER: SEXUALLY EXPLICIT-THE NAKED CAST OF VAN HELSING
THE NAKED ACTORS AND ACRESSES [sic]
Malestars.com and Femalestars.com has [sic] just launched a whole section dedicated to the nakedness of all those Van Helsing actors and actreses [sic]. Get to know their real lives!!


It goes on, but why bother? Any more explicit language and Google may decide my site is porn. I just thought it was worth noting that I got an email from Hugh Jackman.

Anyone else receiving emails from celebrities?

"X" MEN

So, I'm watching the episode of the X-Files where Kryczek (Nicholas Lea) and Mulder (the eternally awesome David Duchovny) end up arrested by the KGB. They're in a cell together, bloody and bruised, and yes, HOT AS HADES.

For a few minutes, I don't know who I like better.

Then Mulder ends up sandwiched in some sort of torture device made up of two sets of mattress springs, where the alien black oil is dripped on him and the alien DNA enters his body through his nostrils. Lovely.

For this episode, I think I'll take Kryczek.



CHARACTER

Tonight I was supposed to have an improv class focusing on developing characters. The class was cancelled, I assume because of low interest.

Instead of becoming despondent and suffering through improv class withdrawal, I've decided on something a little more interactive and exploratory.

If I were ever to seriously pursue acting, I would probably do well to pursue the life of a character actor. These are the people you see in movies over and over again, but never as the lead--they generally "don't look like movie stars," and they give such natural, nuanced performances that sometimes you don't even notice they're there. But they are. They play doctors, and best friends, and geeks, and army personnel. They don't get the magazine covers, or the product endorsements, but they are actors through and through.

Who's your favorite character actor, and why?

I offer several of my favorites for your consideration:

William H. Macy (he is good in every film)

Philip Seymour Hoffmann (often creepy, but often heartbreaking)

Kevin Pollak (hilarious, sarcastic, Jewish, love him!)

J.T. Walsh (deceased, I believe, but again, good in every film)

Judy Greer (she's played the best friend a jillion times opposite everyone from Jennifer Garner to Jennifer Lopez and even for other people who aren't named Jennifer, but is consistently good; her most heartbreaking role was in What Women Want, and look for her in M. Night Shyamalan's latest this summer...)

Stanley Tucci (the UWS neighborhood dad who manages sexy and smart simultaneously--from assassin to airport manager and everywhere in between)

Adam Goldberg (if you only know him as Chandler's crazy roommate Eddie, you're missing something)

Liev Schreiber (Liev has heard me sing at karaoke, I saw him walking in front of Essentials, and he's a good actor)

Joan Allen (most wouldn't consider Joan a character actress, but I think she has remarkable power as an actor that's not given its due...)

And of course, Eugene Levy, Fred Willard, Catherine O'Hara, Michael McKean, Harry Shearer and the cast of regulars employed by Christopher Guest in his movies.

Not a complete list, of course. Any additional thoughts?

Tuesday, June 15, 2004

WHAT'S THAT BANGING?

It's William Hung, back for round two in the "Fifteen Minutes of Fame Run Way Over" department.

This is so wrong.

He bangs. And bangs. And bangs. And his album sells 100,000 copies. How many did his mother buy?

MY NEW CO-BIRTHDAY PAL

...is Coco Cox Arquette.

Yes, I'll say it:

"I'm cuckoo for Coco Cox!"

I just hope she and little Apple Martin don't get married one day: Coco-Apple Martin just doesn't sound right.

Of course, big shout-out to David Arquette and Courtney Cox on the new arrival. Mazal tov, kids!

LOVE YOUR NEIGHBORS...

Love your neighbors as you love yourself.

That's the rabbinic injunction, anyway. But what if your neighbors are famous? Are you still allowed to love them, and proclaim your love openly on the street? Or is that considered a provocation for those restraining orders that I've managed to avoid thus far?

When I see Nathan Lane going to get the paper, am I allowed to tell him that The Birdcage was last night's "Movie That Rocks" on VH1 and that I had to watch it through to the end because I love it so much even though I've seen it forty times?

Should I approach Stanley Tucci when he's walking to the gym or taking his kids to a friend's West End Avenue apartment on Sunday for playdates?

When Ally Sheedy walks her dog, can I tell her how I loved her crazy Allison character from The Breakfast Club?

If I see Tina Fey walking down Broadway past my block, do I take that as a sign to thrust my resume into her Victoria's Secret bag? Is this an acceptable networking opportunity?

What I need is rules for talking to celebrities. Otherwise, I end up making a fool of myself (the Matthew Perry Incident, where I introduce myself by first and last name, as if he needed to know that, and proclaim myself his biggest fan, as if he's never heard that before), or am impossibly clever for a moment, feel a connection, only to have it last for mere seconds before vanishing (The Jon Stewart Incident)...

Do celebrities want to be recognized? Do they want me to acknowledge their successes? Do they enjoy the accolades of neighborly pedestrians?

Monday, June 14, 2004

PONDERING THE PERSONAL

Thinking about posting something personal I've written. But I'm not sure I want it out there yet. It's about the college boyfriend who vanished into the void. Everyone else uses their blogs for this kind of stuff, but I haven't thus far...need to consider the future of this blog carefully. And hear from my loyal readers. Should I post bravely and brazenly about the personal, like Fish and Smitten and Ari (and others!) but without the benefit of relative anonymity?

Sunday, June 13, 2004

NEW ARTICLE ONLINE

My new Jewish Week singles column is online. Check it out here:
A New Profile, a New You

OH, THE BIRTHDAY HORROR

Generally speaking, I was pretty happy with where my birthday falls on the calendar. It heralds the end of school, summertime, the long-awaited return to camp. Even Jewishly, 6-13 was the total number of mitzvot (commandments) in the Torah. What was not to like? OK, so there was that occasional “Friday the 13th” problem, but that superstition never bothered me in any kind of concrete manner.

But today, I got a most unwelcome pre-birthday surprise that chilled me right to the bone. And it came in the most unlikely of places, from a source that I trust to bring me laughter and information—my copy of Entertainment Weekly.

After years of thinking no celebrity shared my birthday, I learned that I was sadly mistaken. The horror struck me like a bitch-slap across my poor, naïve, rapidly aging face. I looked at them, one blonde and one now-redheaded, but their faces the same, the living embodiment of the zodiac sign we shared, and shuddered—it was more terrible than I could have imagined, for the horror had been repeating itself, without my knowledge, for the past seventeen years...

The Olsen Twins share my birthday.

Wednesday, June 09, 2004

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT...

Whether you loved Reagan or hated him, as a President or an actor, you've gotta love the Reaganalia that's transfixed the news media since Ron passed on last weekend.

My favorite is this anecdote, from today. A friend told me that she had invited her friend out tomorrow night (Thursday, June 10) and her friend had said yes, that she could even stay out late because she had the next day off. She called it, "the night before Reagan Day."

So I figured the night before Reagan Day needed its own name. I propose: ALL REAGAN'S EVE.

Are you with me?

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

UNDERWEAR TRAUMA

I love sports, if only for the ludicrous stories generated by sports figures.

Kobe Bryant, a regular jokester himself, told news sources that the reason they lost their recent playoff game was because everyone was traumatized by Shaq's thong.

Let us consider "Shaq's Thong," as a phrase. Aside from being an excellent band name, the two words so juxtaposed should strike fear into the hearts of men. Shaq is like a jillion feet tall. (According to one internet site, the dude is 7 feet, 1 inch tall and weighs 315 pounds.) He's a big man. Can you just, for a moment, imagine what Shaq's thong must look like? You could drop it on Osama Bin Laden's cave and smother him and his cronies to death. We're talking KING THONG, here.

Hyperbole aside, I'm glad that professional sports figures have finally given us permission to fear the power of our own underwear.

Sunday, June 06, 2004

CAN YOU PICTURE THAT?

I know. People have been talking about the proposed subway photography ban for a while now. But the more I think about this, the more upset I get. There's a difference between a tourist or resident snapping a photo of something interesting in the subway (and let's face it, there's always something interesting happening in the subway) and a terrorist casing the joint for "good bomb areas."

I'm all for security, really. But there's got to be a middle ground, right? Maybe licensing is the way to go on this one. If there's a structure in place allowing for the purchase and use of guns in order to ensure public safety (background checks, waiting periods, etc), then a system to make subway photography both safe and permitted should be doable. Right?

The concept of having "press exceptions" to the ban is something I can get behind, but who's considered press? Are all of us potential members of the press? I think most bloggers would see themselves as some sort of news source, at least in some capacity. I know freelancers, who aren't beholden to one publication or another, certainly view themselves as members of the press. And what about members of the international press? Like, oh, I don't know, Al-Jazeera? Do they get a press permit, too?

I don't know about this whole thing. Seems like a limit on artistic creativity to me. And I don't like that.

AN UNEXPECTED CELEBRITY UNION

Yes, I wish Marc and Jennifer well. But her track record isn't good. And Ben's in the hospital for severe bronchitis. I take it he heard about the wedding and couldn't breathe.

Noteworthy: J. Lo kept the same wedding planner that she had for her previous wedding to dancer Cris Judd ("I Claim to Be A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here") and the wedding she had planned for her and Ben Af. (Why not? All the work's already done...)

Also noteworthy: When I went to see SNL, Ben was the host. When I went to see The Daily Show, Ben was the guest. I even asked Jon Stewart if he thought Ben was following me. Jon thought about it, asked me what my name was, and I told him, "Esther." He said, "Esther? Um, no."

True story.

MUST BE THE AGING PROCESS

I really don't think I was always this cheesy. But with my imminent aging scheduled to occur a week from today, I guess my age is finally catching up with me, at least as far as watching TV's concerned.

For instance, earlier, I was watching Something's Gotta Give, and found myself bursting into laughter and tears as frequently as Diane Keaton did in that movie.

And now, watching the late-night episode of Buffy...the one with the senior prom. Buffy and Angel break up, we see Giles and Wesley all gussied up for the first time, and Buffy gets the "Class Protector Award." It always makes my eyes water. I'm such a sap. And then, just when the tear's getting ready to escape my eye, Wes asks Giles if he could "ask Miss Chase to dance," and Giles answers: "My God man, she's 18. And you have the emotional maturity of a blueberry scone. So just have at it, and stop fluttering about." Then Angel shows up all tuxalicious. Just for the prom. "Wild horses...couldn't drag me away..."

Oh, the good old days. When I was involved with the Angel and Buffyverse, when I had a set schedule for my TV viewing. Now I'm a flipper. Hoping for Law & Order SVU, and usually able to find it. Looking for something big, and affecting, and a little schmaltzy. (I'm not gonna lie; I do watch the occasional Cinematherapy movie on WE.)

Even though Sex & the City's coming to TBS, I still need me some new TV shows. Nip/Tuck's a-comin', as is Reno 911. But am entertaining other offers, should any of my readers have suggestions.

Thursday, June 03, 2004

MEDIA RANT

Today, I am irked by an article in the New York Times about the new Oxygen series called "Good Girls Don't..."

Infuriating title of the series aside (what is "good" and why does the title make it seem bad? Where does the ellipsis lead you? This is like that Meatloaf song "I'd Do Anything for Love (But I Won't Do That)" What won't he do? Very unclear), I have an issue with the author's description of one of the show's leads.

In comparing the show to "Absolutely Fabulous," writer Alessandra Stanley says that "the slutty roommate is also a big, fat lush." In case we thought she meant "big, fat" in the Greek wedding kind of way instead of the rotund kind of way, later, she clarifies: "There is nothing very fresh or funny about Jane, the plump, slutty and soused roommate on 'Good Girls Don't . . .'"

Why this bugs me: Jane (played by Joy Gohring) is not fat.

There's no pic of Joy in her IMDB profile , but the Times has a picture of her. So she's not super-skinny, so what? She's got boobs and hips, but last I checked, that just means she's a woman. Did anyone ever tell Kathleen Turner she was fat? Or call Susan Sarandon a slut? Pamela Anderson, Anna Nicole Smith, sure...but that's part of an image that's carefully cultivated (and surgically sculpted).

Independent of the criticism of the quality of the show itself, which may or may not be accurate, I find myself having "Doogie Howser Meets Carrie Bradshaw" moments:
* Does this mean that all women with womanly bodies are perceived as "fat" or "sluts" or both?
* Do men and women react differently to shows like this one?
* Do shows like "Good Girls Don't..." demean women, or is that charge a reaction to the depiction of women taking charge of their lives and having sex like men?
* If there were something "fresh or funny about Jane, the plump, slutty and soused roommate," would Stanley have described Jane/Joy more flatteringly? Does funny make fat/slutty ok?

Thoughts?

Wednesday, June 02, 2004

MEET MY FIANCE, GOOGLE

He knows me. Better than I know myself, he knows me. Anticipates me with every Blogspot banner; by reading words I've written, he has absorbed me. He gets me, peppering my site with links to low-carb bagels and Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

He understands my need to seek out past loves and find my closure, my final resolution on failed relationships. He encourages my ego, showing me how much the world of the Internet values me, and whether I've achieved a measure of fame or if I still wallow in a shallow pool of recognition, hoping the pool will deepen and spread to provide me with ample room to swim.

When I lack the energy to unearth my telephone directories, he comes through with the information I need, and even more. I need only to ask, and he can tell me anything.

I can think of no one better to be my life-mate, my boon companion, through thick or thin or good or bad, through the steps and missteps of life, I have finally received the answer to prayers repeatedly uttered over years of questing.

You had me at hello. Renouncing all others, I choose you.

Google, you complete me.

Tuesday, June 01, 2004

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE JON...

In case I needed another reason to love Jon Stewart--and just to clarify, I didn't--I found the text of the commencement address he delivered last month at his alma mater, The College of William and Mary.

Now why can't I find me a boy like Jon?

The speech, complete with its unique wit, sarcasm, self-deprecation and snarky world commentary available here.

My Urban Kvetch: 06/2004 - 07/2004

Wednesday, June 30, 2004

BAD JEW

With apologies to my loved ones, I have to come clean and announce that I have transgressed against the Jewish people.

I have added Signs to my Netflix queue. Even though it stars Mel Gibson.

I'm very sorry for how this news will affect my family, most of all. I hope that the Jewish community will see fit to leave them out of any ensuing Jewish media tornadoes: this decision is mine alone.

And mom and dad: I hope you know that this does not signal my desire to increase the fortune of Mr. Gibson. I merely wished to see M. Night Shyamalan's movie before The Village is released next month. I didn't see it in the theater, but now, it's time.

This also does not signal a complete rejection of traditional Judaism. I'm still looking for a Jewish guy to build a future with, and I'm still a member in good standing of my synagogue. This is purely a pop cultural choice that has no impact on my future as an American Jew.

If this has in any way disappointed you, I sincerely apologize. It was not my intent to offend, but we all make choices in life that affect us first and others second. This is my choice.



Tuesday, June 29, 2004

WHO IS THE "HALF-BLOOD PRINCE"?

So, CNN announced the title of J.K. Rowling's next Harry Potter book: Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince.

So the question open for discussion and endless speculation is, who exactly is the Half-Blood Prince?

CNN says that the HBP is neither Voldemort nor HP. My friend Dan suggests it might be my friend Jim, who's leaving for Israel Wednesday despite many pleas from many Jewish women. (Could explain the hasty retreat.) But then again, maybe Dan's saying that to throw us off the fact that Dan himself is the HBP.

At first, I thought this must mean that the prince in question is only half-wizard, like Hermione--this could mean a long-lost relative for good old H. But then I remembered, in HP lingo, someone who is half-wizard and half-Muggle is called a Mudblood.

The real question is, what does the word "prince" mean in the HP-universe? I don't remember royalty being a factor in the previous books.

And then I remembered! I'm 33, and a full-time freelancer. And I need to get some work done. Enough of this narishkeit. I turn it over to you for discussion.

TODAY I'LL MEET THE BOY I'M GONNA MARRY...

When life brings you what you want without your having to ask for it, that's what I like to call "pigeon-shit" karma.

My editor at the Jewish Week asked me to cover tonight's finals of the "Funniest Amateur Jewish Standup Comic in New York" competition, which I was planning to attend anyway. My piece is about 400 words, which isn't long at all, but it's getting front-of-the-book prominence, and is going to contain highlights of the show, as well as a brief interview with the winner. As much as I'd love to see a woman win, because women don't get enough props in stand-up, I'd also love to see a man win. Specifically, my man.

If there's any romantic justice in the world, my bashert (my meant-to-be, or as Friend Phoebe would have said, my "lobster") will be there tonight, too. And he's gonna win the competition, and an interview with me. During the interview, he'll be all aglow, energized by the thrill of victory and the presence of a beautiful, hilarious woman. (Just to clarify, that's me.) I'll ask him for his number, in case I have any questions that I need to follow up on, and he'll ask me for mine, just because. Under the dimmed lights at the comedy club, romance will bloom, a love sprung from laughter and nurtured by a steady humor.

Plus, when I submit the article, another paycheck. That's a "win-win" scenario. I'd say that was worth taking a piece of poop in the arm.

WELCOME TO PLANET GIRTH

Oh boy. Slate published a review of the new commercial for hot dogs. You've seen it, where that guy is roasting his wieners on a grill, and talks about girth for what seems like an hour; he calls his franks "girthy," and that he loves the way that sounds.

Let's be "frank." It does sound funny. But it also sounds sexual. Slate's Seth Stevenson did a Lexis-Nexis search for the word "girth":

A quick Nexis search shows that "girthy" made it into print only 23 times in the past year. Three times it refers to ears of corn (it appears to be commercial farming jargon). The New York Times employs it to describe an opera singer (of course they do). And oddly, it appears in four separate stories in Guitar Player magazine (each time, the word refers either to guitar necks or guitar sounds; all four stories are by a writer named Art Thompson—who either had an ongoing bet with friends, or was in a real bad adjective rut).

But in modern usage, girth is used almost exclusively to describe one thing. If you're curious, Seth Stevenson recommends that you do NOT do a web seach for the word. Believe me, you'll find that the usage is almost always penile.

Hot dogs. A.K.A. wieners. That plump when you cook 'em. (Don't we all.) And in addition to their phallic shape and their tendency to grow when you get them hot, now they're girthy. I know the advertising mantra of "sex sells," but does it always have to?

Enjoy your Fourth of July barbecues, everyone!

Monday, June 28, 2004

CAMP MOVIES WE LOVE

At least for me, there are certain movies whose themes, characters and situations evoke the themes, characters and situations that I experienced (or wish I had experienced) at Camp. Here are my favorites: make sure to weigh in with your opinions and additions to the list.

Indian Summer (1993)
My favorite, most closely resembles the activities and personalities of Camp Ramah in the Berkshires, where I spent summers. The story of a camp director (Alan Arkin) who invites some of his favorite campers back for a week of Camp-style relaxation. Elizabeth McGovern's sarcastic and spunky, Bill Paxton's irreverent and incorrigible, Diane Lane is luminous, as usual, and Kevin Pollak's hilarious. (I wish I had gone to camp with Kevin Pollak. And that we were married. But that's another post.)

Camp (2003)
A touching and hilarious summer at a performing arts camp. This is what Camp would look like if every day were Yom Machazeh (the day when you rehearse the play ALL DAY until that evening's performance) and every peulah (activity) was drama. Starring a cast of extremely talented unknowns. My favorite scene (don't worry, I won't spoil it): the debate over ethnic casting.

Wet Hot American Summer (2001)
Counselors try not to work too hard as they provide minimal care for their charges and frolic in the heat of summer. Celebrity counselors include Janeane Garofalo, David Hyde Pierce and Paul Rudd.

Little Darlings (1980)
Tatum O'Neal. Kristy MacNichol. Matt Dillon. Add the plot of "Losin' It" and you've got Little Darlings. Look for a blonde, extremely young Cynthia Nixon in a supporting role. And maybe someone can explain to me why all the campers in the same bunk seem to be different ages.

Meatballs (1979)
Bill Murray. That's all the information I have. Which is good, because that's all the information you need.

What are your favorites and why?

Sunday, June 27, 2004

PLOP

I suppose I had a good run. I mean, I had been living in NYC for about a decade, and this had never happened to me before.

It began, as such things do, somewhere up there--out of the literal blue, it fell at extreme velocity, until it hit target with a plop and a barely discernible splatter.

A pigeon had pooped in the great above, but it had long flown away by the time its wretched refuse was expelled from the kingdom of avian body, into the atmosphere, a rapidly accelerating gift to the world that became a smear on my arm.

Attempts to remove the greyish-white matter from my forearm were valiant and varied: scraping my arm against a building on West End Avenue, ripping off a piece of a street lamp flyer for a "man with a van," using someone's discarded deli napkin.

The more I tried, the more the excrement became part of my epidermis. To the world, it looked like a small smudge, a pieces of shmutz easily removed, once home, with vanilla-scented anti-bacterial soap. But I knew it was a metaphor for an internal life, externalized and personified.

A bright side to being a pigeon toilet: this is supposed to mean good luck is on the way. I'm looking forward to it. Because otherwise, it is merely literal: a crock of shit.

MOORE TO THINK ABOUT

Walking into the theater, I thought I was prepared. I had just seen Mark Hamill walking his dogs. They were small, fluffy and white, as if clouds had transmogrified into canines. Democrats had a table set up outside, and kept asking us "Do you want to help defeat President Bush?" as they hit us up for funds.

But walking out after seeing Fahrenheit 9/11, a masterful if incredibly disturbing film, I realized that there is no such thing as prepared. Just as I was not prepared for Gore to win the presidency and yet not be inaugurated. Just as no one was prepared for 9/11. Just as hearing statistics of war losses is never the same as seeing the pain on a mother's face when she learns her son or daughter's been killed in a land far from home.

After the movie, which was replete with incredibly appropriate musical selections and film documentation of our President's bizarre facial tics and dulcet intonations, I felt my heart racing. I stood on line for the ladies' room, and felt an exacerbated sense of frustration, not at the line, which was considerable, but at the film and its ramifications. My blood pressure and my dander were up. We were riled, all of us. And we felt helpless.

The film reminded us all that democracy is necessarily limited; our government cannot reveal to us all the information it has. By the same token, Michael Moore clearly made a film that represents his opinion, his version of the truth. So, whose truth is truthiest? There's no way to know.

It's a bit shy of conspiracy theory, which I partially embrace due to my foundational entertainment diet of Oliver Stone films and nine seasons of the X-Files, but I am at the point where I'm not sure how much of an impact individuals can make on the electoral process. Yes, I'll vote, but I'm not in love with Kerry either. I don't know what the answer is.

I'm trying to re-calibrate my mind, to bring myself back to the time before the movie, when my ignorance was my bliss, when I could watch Luke Skywalker become Luke Dogwalker. And I'm having trouble.

Friday, June 25, 2004

MADONNA, ROSH HASHANAH; ROSH HASHANAH, MADONNA

Do you believe this? Madonna and Jewish-related subjects: This is like a runaway train. This Rosh Hashanah, Madonna's going to Israel with a group of 100 kabbalah students.

Given, I have several comments.

Firstly, who are the other 99 students who are in a Kabbalah class with Madonna? Can you imagine being on the bus with her as the group travels around the country? She'd be talking with her newish-Jewish accent inflected by Michigan via London, and flaunting her Jean-Paul Gauthier wardrobe, insisting that people call her Esther (my name, need I remind you) and practicing the guttural "khaf" sound and trilling her "resh"es.

My other comment pertains to M's accommodations while she visits the Holy Land. According to the article above, "Madonna will stay in an out-of-the-way guesthouse and avoid fans and TV cameras so that she'll be able to focus on her cabala studies." Let me state for the record, unequivocally, that this will never happen. How out-of-the-way could any guesthouse be in a state the size of New Jersey? And as far as privacy's concerned, unless the guesthouse is a Mossad safe house, there's no way her location's going to remain a secret. In fact, I have so many relatives in Israel that I bet that by September, I'll know where she's staying.

Stay tuned in the weeks ahead, as Madonna continues to raid the beachhead of Judaism and pillages selected customs and beliefs for adoption.

Thursday, June 24, 2004

IN THE SNOOD...

For many Jews, a snood is a sign of a married woman's affiliation with an Orthodoxy that's traditional enough to demand that married women cover their hair in public, and modern enough to not insist on a wig. Now, Gawker reports that Chloe Sevigny is wearing one:

on saturday i saw chloe sevigny browsing the non-fiction section in the union square barnes and noble. she was surprisingly subdued in white overall shorts and a white tank. of course it wouldn't be chloe without something bizarre, she had on a white crocheted snood. i was in a rush, couldn't see what she was buying.

Since she was photographed shopping on a Saturday, my guess is that this does NOT mean that Chloe's gone the way of Madonna in embracing Jewish religious paraphernalia.

What's a snood? Click here to find out.

Wednesday, June 23, 2004

GUEST POST: MADONNA ON MOORE

[Ladies and gentlemen...Madonna! Umm, I mean, Esther. But don't get confused, this is TAFKAM (the artist formerly known as Madonna), not Esther/me, the proprietress of this blog. Oh, whatever. Here's Madge:]

Greetings, my loyal fans. I encourage you all to open your hearts to Kabbalah; let it inspire you to see Fahrenheit 9/11, a film by my good friend Michael Moore (Kabbalah name: Immanuel), whose name sounds even more soothing when I inflect it with my newly-acquired clipped British accent.

Guy (Kabbalah name: Guy) and I are appalled by the government's behaviour during this cruel, cruel war. This is why we live in England, so we do not have to get involved in actually changing American foreign policy. As I critiqued during my underappreciated rap song "American Life," American society obsessed with money and status:

I got a lawyer and a manager, an agent and a chef
Three nannies, an assistant and a driver and a jet
A trainer and a butler and a bodyguard or five
A gardener and a stylist, do you think I’m satisfied


I appeal to your sense of morality and compassion. Vote for Michael Moore and against capitalism. Raise your voice and please buy my children's books and an "Esther Rocks" t-shirt for $85, proceeds above cost will benefit children. Specifically, children named Lola (Kabbalah name: Liora) and Rocco (Kabbalah name: Reuel).

May Kabbalah bless you in your spiritual voyage toward discovery of the Immanent. Vendor kiosks are located at all the major exits.

OH, THAT WACKY RELIGION

Lots of (non-Jewish) religious news today.

Firstly, Pope says nope to Ope. And by this I mean, JP2 has got a book coming out in September and refuses to hit the talk show/promotion circuit. (Who does he think he is, THE POPE??) He'll never be "an Oprah book" now...if he wants his publication to be a success beyond the jillions of Catholics and Pope-heads (which is my invented, non-respectful term for the equivalent of the Pope's groupies), he's going to have to take a lesson from Shmuely Boteach and do some promotion. Might I suggest an on-air interview with Air America's Al Franken or Janeane Garofalo?

Secondly, we've got the Archbishop of Canterbury in talks to guest on an episode of The Simpsons. He's a big fan, apparently, and says that the show is "generally on the side of the angels" and that he notices similarities between himself and Homer Simpson. The famous Olde English Canterbury Tales aside, does Canterbury dominate enough Nielsen points to merit an appearance by its Archbishop? Dude, where's Shmuely Boteach's guest spot?

[Special bonus for you guys who check out the second story: Beliefnet has Simpson quizzes. "How well do you know Apu?" "How much do you know about Ned Flanders?" etc...]

Which religious figure would you most like to see do a guest star appearance on The Simpsons? Create the wish list here: state your chosen religious figure and why, and maybe I'll forward the list to the producers of The Simpsons for their consideration.

Tuesday, June 22, 2004

SPAM FICTION WORKSHOP

[This entry utilizes mostly words sent to me in spam messages. I've added some prepositions and verbs, but all of the nouns and most of the adjectives came from spam...]

At six o'clock day began to break; and, with the first glimmer of light, the electric light of the narwhal disappeared into the truth that is the papillary royal penthouse.

In these simultaneous observations they thought themselves justified in estimating the minimum length of the mammal at more than three hundred and fifty feet, as the Shannon and Helvetia were of smaller dimensions than it, though they measured three hundred feet over all.

To decorate his bricklaying, Coach Gregory was the only prey alive on the planet. Bryan Krause, wingman to Fantasia, descended the imperceptible gangplank, like an anglo a la carte, on the way to the perth temple to commit a blemish against Ernestine.

But to assassinate streptomycin would cause uproarious apathy; the megalomaniac warlike asylum, known in certain circles as "nobelium sky," had a henchman paying airfare to the quarryman; he would call Hearst ashy, as the sensor invoked Persian playwrights.

The conservator's powder left him with blackfeet, yearning to strengthen his palate; to circumcise Calypso.

Monday, June 21, 2004

CONTEMPLATION

[Warning: Tough issues ahead.]

Watching Bridget Jones's Diary on TBS. Am laughing and crying and having dreadfully dirty thoughts about Colin Firth, all at the same time. (The way he simmers, never actually smiling, but somehow conveying all with his eyes, brow, profile...) Even his big girlie-man fight scene with Hugh Grant ("It's Raining Men" pulses in the background as they fight until both of them are bloodied and sweaty) leaves me all keyed up, and feeling my loneliness reassert itself.

Colin aside (blasphemy), the one thing that's really affecting me is the scene where Bridget cooks dinner for her friends to commemorate her 33rd birthday. There's a resonance there that is especially strong for me this year. I know what that's like. So hard to spend year after year planning one's own birthday, trying to banish the loneliness in advance before it ever arrives on my doorstep.

The truth: I'm tired of it already. I want what I have never had, the companionship, the stability, the support--I even want the heartbreak that pushes my friends to the emotional brink, because it meant that even in those failed relationships, there was a compelling strength. There are times when I am even envious of the pain. That's how bad it can be.

Birthdays seem as fitting a time as any for reflection. But every year, the pressure's on: what, who with, where, when. But what always gets me is the why and the how long.

Why it always seems like no matter how many friends surround me in celebration, I'm always walking home alone. How long it's been since I had anyone else plan anything for my birthday. Why I always throw these huge parties, and enjoy them, but somehow still resent the fact that I'm the one who has to plan everything in celebration of myself, which seems so self-indulgent, conceited, and artificial. How long is it going to be before He shows up? Why is it taking so long?

I love my friends. The turnout for my party was amazing, a veritable "This is Your Life," featuring cameos by camp friends and work friends, shul friends and new friends from the wonderful world of blogging. I felt very lucky; with a few drinks in me, "lucky" even felt like "euphoric."

But euphoria fades. As happy as we may feel surrounded by friends and alcohol on our birthdays, on a daily basis, we single people walk around with the world on our shoulders. We lack a security of the most basic kind. Even if we are happy to the extent that the solitary life allows, with our professional status or our freedom or our independence, we harbor a darkness that we cannot show to others. We have to keep our happy faces front and center, to woo the unseen future suitors of our lives. We banish depression to the netherworld and wear black-tie happiness at the weddings of our friends, as we shelve our feelings and our doubt about our own single stories ending happily.

And on our birthdays, and sometimes for days after, we feel the aging process wearing on us. We look to others to lift our spirits. When our spirits are up, the day is no challenge. But when night falls, we fight to submerge the darkness.

Speaking of darkness, I have to say there's nothing scarier than suddenly seeing a centipede crawling up your wall while you're watching a Stephen King movie (Salem's Lot--vampires, but no souls, like my Angel). No sleep for me tonight.

BLACKOUT DID NOT RESULT IN BABY BOOM

Or, at least that's what About.com reports.

Personally, if I'd had the opportunity, I might have engaged in a little blackout activity of my own. But alas, instead of being in the arms of someone I loved (or could learn to love for about half an hour), I was sweating my ass off in the subway, trapped with a bunch of silent strangers, unsure if the world above us was crumbling or descending into chaos. And yes, I scanned the car, but there was no one in it even suitable for TV-movie-end-of-the-world snogging. It was an appalling display, on all levels.

As the anniversary approaches, I'm going to try to sell my account of the blackout from the subterranean perspective to a publication of some sort. (If you know anyone who's interested, let me know.) But if no one snaps it up, look for the story here in August.

Sunday, June 20, 2004

MADONNANTHOLOGY

For your convenience, and in light of recent press releases and interviews published by the Material Mom, I offer my Madonnanthology, my Immaculate Collection, of blog entries about Madonna and Me.

As you can see, we've had a spotty history, starting off strong, and slowly disintegrating. The closer she tries to come in appropriating shades of me through my tradition and my name, the more I push away; she's seen the movie Single White Female too many times and is trying to play psychotic Jennifer Jason Leigh to my trusting Bridget Fonda...(Feels like I'm going to lose my mind! She just keeps on pushing my love over the borderline.)

The saga began, as sagas often do, with a dinner invitation.

April 14
YOU'RE INVITED TO SHABBAT DINNER WITH THE MATERIAL GIRL

April 20
ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

April 22
YET ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

May 4
STILL ANOTHER LETTER FROM THE YESHIVA GIRL TO THE MATERIAL GIRL

June 16
QUIEN ES LA NINA (WHO'S THAT GIRL?)

June 17
CALL ME MADONNA

June 18
BECOMING ESTHER: THE MADONNA HAIKUS

Will there be more, or is the media at last oversaturated with reportage of this story? How long will this frenzy over the name change stay in vogue? Will I be forced to get into the groove of being shadowed by an aging pop star? Perhaps I'll have to open my heart to the possibility of a writing holiday from this subject matter; perhaps on an isla bonita somewhere, a lucky star will shine on me, and my name will be my own to cherish again.

Wow, sounds like a prayer.

Friday, June 18, 2004

MY OWN PRIVATE GOOGLEPLEX

[Believe it or not, this is a non-Madonna related post. The names have been changed, but the story is real. I used the name Dennis because I don’t know anyone with that name, and for the joke payoff/Angel reference embedded in paragraph four. It’s my blog, and I’ll set up jokes if I want to.]

In the beginning, there was Dennis. Not precisely at the beginning of everything, but certainly at the birth of the city girl I’ve since become. We met in college, dating only briefly during the fall of my senior year. By spring, our connection was gone. I was never sure why it faded, and it did somewhat darken my last months in school.

Nearly two years later, we crossed paths again, in one of those Hollywood-style-magic moments, in the randomness of Grand Central Station; as endless, hurried people filed through subway turnstiles, the two of us stood fixed, talking as an hour flew by. Neither of us had a pen, but I had a lipstick, so our exchange of phone numbers fell into cliché. We reconnected, and then reconnected.

Amid a dozen phone calls of flirtation and chatter, and a handful of dates in October, each of them more intense than the next, lasting several hours each, it seemed like…not a relationship, but a something. There was even an implication that we’d be spending New Year’s Eve together in the big city. When we were together there was an unbelievable intensity…more of a flashbulb, briefly bright, then not so much burnt out as vanished. It never had a chance to develop into love, of the roaring, epic variety, but we laughed a lot, and I still believe that there were true, pure moments when neither one of us wanted to be with anyone else. In my younger, less experienced days, that feeling was like the generic version of the brand name love.

One late December night, he didn’t pick me up for our date. I assumed that something had happened to him, and left him several messages. (Otherwise, why wouldn’t he call?) But he didn’t call. And when the Phantom Dennis vanished, there was no smoke lingering in the air, nor ash lying at my feet, just an absence where an undefined, potential something used to be. My ego was bruised, but mostly, I just missed his company.

That was the week before New Year’s, 1994. Since then, not a word. Just the paranoia of living in the same city, knowing that despite the statistical unlikelihood of running into an ex in a city of millions, it’s bound to happen. After all, it had happened to us once before. Did that increase or decrease our odds of randomly seeing each other again? I thought I spied him on the street, heard his voice, saw his jacket on a guy his height and build, saw a man with a goatee; it didn’t matter whether it was really him or not. It could have been. And my face flushed, as if I had done something wrong, and I ran from any potential confrontation. We never spoke again.

For years, when a rare dating prospect sailed onto the horizon, it was a longstanding joke among my friends: since Dennis and I hadn’t officially broken up, how did I know we weren’t still together? And if we were still together and I started seeing other men, wouldn’t that be cheating?

I heard through the grapevine that he had moved to Boston. (At that point, I was pretty sure I was free to see other people.) I’d never know anything more about him. It was the end.

And then there was Google.

I resisted the temptation for several years—before this year, it had never occurred me to do the Internet equivalent of sending out detectives to comb the web and potentially provide me with insight into someone who had removed himself from my life. If he had wanted me to know about his post-me existence, he would have called. Clearly, the phantom wanted no part of me.

But then, suddenly, I realized the decade-mark was approaching. Nine years after our inconclusive parting, curiosity reasserted itself loudly, and I couldn’t stop myself: I sent out an veritable Googleplex of unknown spies to plumb the breadth and width of the Internet and flesh out the enigma of nine missing years.

One simple search yielded the information I sought: a near-complete profile, in the form of his professional resume. A roadmap of everywhere he’d been, geographically (Massachusetts), spiritually (Buddhism), academically (clinical psychology). And at the top, gleaming like neon, was Temptation personified, an unholy Grail: an email address.

Over three days in November, I created a comprehensive chronicle of the life I had lived over the last near-decade, providing him with the type of information about me that I had uncovered about him, translating my bulleted resume into prose, so we’d be informationally even. It was the kind of email I periodically get from an old classmate who finds my writing on the Internet—just touching base, keeping it neutral, friendly, curious.

I kept it in my “drafts” folder for three weeks, never really knowing if I intended to send it. What was the point, really, of dredging the riverbed of history and trying to find meaning amidst the mud? It wasn’t in pursuit of romance rekindled; I never believed Dennis was right for me. He was a vegetarian, for God’s sake. (Speaking of God, our theological differences were stark, to the resume-revealed extent that while I worked at the Jewish Theological Seminary, he attended summer programs at a Buddhist seminary in Nepal.) I knew there was a better fit out there somewhere for both of us.

But after 9/11, when men and women all over the United States checked in with their exes, trying to reconnect with the people in their past, and in the process, to reconnect with a more stable emotional state, I heard nothing from him. I knew he was living in Boston, studying the human mind. But it always kind of bothered me that he never tried to find out where I had been on that day. More proof that our destinies were separate strands. He wasn’t for me. But I still wanted to know more.

I had no real hope that he’d respond. But hope’s feathers kept itching me, like dermatitis or wool, or like his assertive facial hair used to irritate my sensitive skin during our intense makeout sessions. In the end, I sent the email out of writer’s curiosity. I had to, more as a communicative, sensitive person extending a hand of friendship, than an ex-something’s madness. (But in retrospect, my disclaimer that the letter was “not from some deranged stalker” might have struck him as slightly alarming. Oops.)

However eternal my catlike curiosity and persistent hope sprang, it was for nothing. New Year’s Eve week 1994 or 2003, no difference. No response. Now that was the Dennis I remembered.

With 2004, a new year, a fresh start. But before bidding the memory a final, fond farewell and banishing it to memory and experience, I indulged in one goodbye Google. Accidentally leaving his middle initial out of the search, I found a new webpage that I hadn’t seen before. This more comprehensive homepage revealed that, during the month of November, while I was moving paragraphs and phrases around, crafting and redrafting my email to a man from my past, Dennis was moving straight ahead with his future. By the time I finally sent the email in December, he and his wife (Jane) were undoubtedly on their honeymoon. I pictured their return to overstuffed email accounts and the unceremonious deletion of messages from anyone they didn’t know…or perhaps Dennis’s dramatic “you won’t believe this, honey” reading of my email to his new bride, as she teases her devoted husband about the trail of broken hearts he has clearly left in his wake over the years. But I recognize that it ultimately doesn’t matter what they think of me. This search was never really about Dennis, and it certainly wasn’t about Jane. It was about me.

I’m not sure I believe that some kind of cosmic energy had him bob to the surface of my consciousness in November and December, as he was moving on with his life, prompting me to move ahead with mine. And after taking such care with each word in that email, I don’t know if he ever even saw it. Even if he did, I doubt I’ll ever hear from him. But at least now, I have the closure I deserved so long ago.

I cannot guarantee that curiosity will not prompt a future return to the website, to view photos from Dennis and Jane’s wedding. But our breakup is now official--effective immediately, I’m dating other people again. Guilt-free, and somehow lighter, freed from the Googleplex and emancipated from the ballast of the unresolved.

BECOMING ESTHER: THE MADONNA HAIKUS

Becoming Esther
takes more than holy red strings
and press releases

Material Girl
to Biblical heroine
is a long strange trip

Kabbalah water
From a hundred sacred springs
Won't help her find peace

Becoming Esther
For self or for children's sake
Clarifies nothing

Lola and Rocco
Are a joke at Hebrew school
As mom goes haimish

Guy wears a kippah
and tries on new religions
But nothing quite fits

Becoming Esther
Be she queen or freelancer
The life draws her in

"Kabbalah is mine,"
Madonna clutches it close
True blue, like a prayer.

Thursday, June 17, 2004

CALL ME MADONNA

Madonna says, "Call me Esther."

I say, "Call me Madonna."

So tedious to have my name be the focus of so much media attention, and yet not be the beneficiary of that attention. Must contact my agent and identify ways to benefit from this media onslaught as Madonna tries to encroach on my life.

Wednesday, June 16, 2004

QUIEN ES LA NINA? (WHO'S THAT GIRL?)

Dear Madonna,

Who's that girl? Mom, Mystic, Material Girl? It's like I don't even know you anymore.

I remember when we first began. Didn't know how lost I was, until I found you. And you made me feel shiny and new. You were burning up, burning up with your love of Judaism, and you asked me questions till you were true blue in the face.

I answered the best I could. I issued invitations to Shabbat dinner, to which you never responded. You asked me about Kabbalah, and I told you what little I knew. I remember how the parks of New York used to be our playground. It used to be the place we ran to, whenever we were in need of a friend. Lourdes and Rocco loved our Shabbat afternoon forays to Riverside Park for lunch, and then our walk over to Central Park, where we scoped out eligible ex-yeshiva boys for me; you were always so good at identifying the "yeshiva boys gone wild," it was a talent, sheer and true.

When you asked me about the biblical significance of my name, I told you. I had no idea that "the Mother of Reinvention" was about to reinvent herself as me. Or at least, as an extreme sort of "The Swan"-like Madge-Esther hybrid.

I know you envy my freelancer's lifestyle, wherein I splurge on 1.5 liters of Diet Coke when I'm having a good income week. I know you harbor a secret desire to work for Jewish nonprofit institutions. And I know Guy won't let you switch careers and move back to New York, where you, as an artist, began. I know that's what that weird accent of yours is about: the quest for identity. I know that's the reason for your endless production of Kabbalah-related children's books, because you desperately want the chance to start over.

But be careful as you "attach yourself to the energy of a new name." Your Judaism is not my Judaism. In fact, your Judaism isn't even my Judaism's Kabbalah. You've been swallowed by the L.A. incarnation of the Kabbalah Center, and they're not any kind of Jewish that I recognize. You pray every day, but to what? In what language and using whose words?

Madge, this is my last letter. I beg of you: take some time off from the Kabbalah Center. Study with a real rabbi; although I know you'd never describe yourself as conservative, in terms of rabbis, Conservative's probably your best bet. I can recommend a few people, if you're really interested in learning about Judaism, and what Kabbalah really is.

But in all likelihood, you're not really interested. What you needed was a big strong hand to lift you to a higher ground; The Kabbalah Center came along at a time when you were looking for a values structure for your family, and you grasped at it, maybe without even thinking about what it was.

As you prepare to release your next children's book, I am preparing to release you from my life. I can't be party to your superficial minings of the more elusive elements of my religious tradition. Find yourself a new Jew guru. I'm done.

I wish you happiness, that you may truly find it somewhere beyond the cash value of it all, and the spirituality you've been craving ever since childhood. But remember the keys to spirituality: Life is a mystery. Everyone must stand alone. But then, you hear someone call your name and it feels like home.

Esther


Thanks, Karol, for bringing this latest development to my attention.

HUGH JACKMAN

Got your attention, didn't I?

Well, I got a piece of spam this morning that used the same technique. Then, thinking it unlikely that Hugh had tracked down my email address and was calling to thank me for my tepid review of Van Helsing, I looked at the subject header. I'm reprinting the choice elements of the email's contents, courtesy of Outlook's preview pane. (Never open spam, kids! It's potentially full of viruses, promises of nudity, and is undoubtedly full of typos and incorrect grammar, see below...)

HEADER: SEXUALLY EXPLICIT-THE NAKED CAST OF VAN HELSING
THE NAKED ACTORS AND ACRESSES [sic]
Malestars.com and Femalestars.com has [sic] just launched a whole section dedicated to the nakedness of all those Van Helsing actors and actreses [sic]. Get to know their real lives!!


It goes on, but why bother? Any more explicit language and Google may decide my site is porn. I just thought it was worth noting that I got an email from Hugh Jackman.

Anyone else receiving emails from celebrities?

"X" MEN

So, I'm watching the episode of the X-Files where Kryczek (Nicholas Lea) and Mulder (the eternally awesome David Duchovny) end up arrested by the KGB. They're in a cell together, bloody and bruised, and yes, HOT AS HADES.

For a few minutes, I don't know who I like better.

Then Mulder ends up sandwiched in some sort of torture device made up of two sets of mattress springs, where the alien black oil is dripped on him and the alien DNA enters his body through his nostrils. Lovely.

For this episode, I think I'll take Kryczek.



CHARACTER

Tonight I was supposed to have an improv class focusing on developing characters. The class was cancelled, I assume because of low interest.

Instead of becoming despondent and suffering through improv class withdrawal, I've decided on something a little more interactive and exploratory.

If I were ever to seriously pursue acting, I would probably do well to pursue the life of a character actor. These are the people you see in movies over and over again, but never as the lead--they generally "don't look like movie stars," and they give such natural, nuanced performances that sometimes you don't even notice they're there. But they are. They play doctors, and best friends, and geeks, and army personnel. They don't get the magazine covers, or the product endorsements, but they are actors through and through.

Who's your favorite character actor, and why?

I offer several of my favorites for your consideration:

William H. Macy (he is good in every film)

Philip Seymour Hoffmann (often creepy, but often heartbreaking)

Kevin Pollak (hilarious, sarcastic, Jewish, love him!)

J.T. Walsh (deceased, I believe, but again, good in every film)

Judy Greer (she's played the best friend a jillion times opposite everyone from Jennifer Garner to Jennifer Lopez and even for other people who aren't named Jennifer, but is consistently good; her most heartbreaking role was in What Women Want, and look for her in M. Night Shyamalan's latest this summer...)

Stanley Tucci (the UWS neighborhood dad who manages sexy and smart simultaneously--from assassin to airport manager and everywhere in between)

Adam Goldberg (if you only know him as Chandler's crazy roommate Eddie, you're missing something)

Liev Schreiber (Liev has heard me sing at karaoke, I saw him walking in front of Essentials, and he's a good actor)

Joan Allen (most wouldn't consider Joan a character actress, but I think she has remarkable power as an actor that's not given its due...)

And of course, Eugene Levy, Fred Willard, Catherine O'Hara, Michael McKean, Harry Shearer and the cast of regulars employed by Christopher Guest in his movies.

Not a complete list, of course. Any additional thoughts?

Tuesday, June 15, 2004

WHAT'S THAT BANGING?

It's William Hung, back for round two in the "Fifteen Minutes of Fame Run Way Over" department.

This is so wrong.

He bangs. And bangs. And bangs. And his album sells 100,000 copies. How many did his mother buy?

MY NEW CO-BIRTHDAY PAL

...is Coco Cox Arquette.

Yes, I'll say it:

"I'm cuckoo for Coco Cox!"

I just hope she and little Apple Martin don't get married one day: Coco-Apple Martin just doesn't sound right.

Of course, big shout-out to David Arquette and Courtney Cox on the new arrival. Mazal tov, kids!

LOVE YOUR NEIGHBORS...

Love your neighbors as you love yourself.

That's the rabbinic injunction, anyway. But what if your neighbors are famous? Are you still allowed to love them, and proclaim your love openly on the street? Or is that considered a provocation for those restraining orders that I've managed to avoid thus far?

When I see Nathan Lane going to get the paper, am I allowed to tell him that The Birdcage was last night's "Movie That Rocks" on VH1 and that I had to watch it through to the end because I love it so much even though I've seen it forty times?

Should I approach Stanley Tucci when he's walking to the gym or taking his kids to a friend's West End Avenue apartment on Sunday for playdates?

When Ally Sheedy walks her dog, can I tell her how I loved her crazy Allison character from The Breakfast Club?

If I see Tina Fey walking down Broadway past my block, do I take that as a sign to thrust my resume into her Victoria's Secret bag? Is this an acceptable networking opportunity?

What I need is rules for talking to celebrities. Otherwise, I end up making a fool of myself (the Matthew Perry Incident, where I introduce myself by first and last name, as if he needed to know that, and proclaim myself his biggest fan, as if he's never heard that before), or am impossibly clever for a moment, feel a connection, only to have it last for mere seconds before vanishing (The Jon Stewart Incident)...

Do celebrities want to be recognized? Do they want me to acknowledge their successes? Do they enjoy the accolades of neighborly pedestrians?

Monday, June 14, 2004

PONDERING THE PERSONAL

Thinking about posting something personal I've written. But I'm not sure I want it out there yet. It's about the college boyfriend who vanished into the void. Everyone else uses their blogs for this kind of stuff, but I haven't thus far...need to consider the future of this blog carefully. And hear from my loyal readers. Should I post bravely and brazenly about the personal, like Fish and Smitten and Ari (and others!) but without the benefit of relative anonymity?

Sunday, June 13, 2004

NEW ARTICLE ONLINE

My new Jewish Week singles column is online. Check it out here:
A New Profile, a New You

OH, THE BIRTHDAY HORROR

Generally speaking, I was pretty happy with where my birthday falls on the calendar. It heralds the end of school, summertime, the long-awaited return to camp. Even Jewishly, 6-13 was the total number of mitzvot (commandments) in the Torah. What was not to like? OK, so there was that occasional “Friday the 13th” problem, but that superstition never bothered me in any kind of concrete manner.

But today, I got a most unwelcome pre-birthday surprise that chilled me right to the bone. And it came in the most unlikely of places, from a source that I trust to bring me laughter and information—my copy of Entertainment Weekly.

After years of thinking no celebrity shared my birthday, I learned that I was sadly mistaken. The horror struck me like a bitch-slap across my poor, naïve, rapidly aging face. I looked at them, one blonde and one now-redheaded, but their faces the same, the living embodiment of the zodiac sign we shared, and shuddered—it was more terrible than I could have imagined, for the horror had been repeating itself, without my knowledge, for the past seventeen years...

The Olsen Twins share my birthday.

Wednesday, June 09, 2004

WITH ALL DUE RESPECT...

Whether you loved Reagan or hated him, as a President or an actor, you've gotta love the Reaganalia that's transfixed the news media since Ron passed on last weekend.

My favorite is this anecdote, from today. A friend told me that she had invited her friend out tomorrow night (Thursday, June 10) and her friend had said yes, that she could even stay out late because she had the next day off. She called it, "the night before Reagan Day."

So I figured the night before Reagan Day needed its own name. I propose: ALL REAGAN'S EVE.

Are you with me?

Tuesday, June 08, 2004

UNDERWEAR TRAUMA

I love sports, if only for the ludicrous stories generated by sports figures.

Kobe Bryant, a regular jokester himself, told news sources that the reason they lost their recent playoff game was because everyone was traumatized by Shaq's thong.

Let us consider "Shaq's Thong," as a phrase. Aside from being an excellent band name, the two words so juxtaposed should strike fear into the hearts of men. Shaq is like a jillion feet tall. (According to one internet site, the dude is 7 feet, 1 inch tall and weighs 315 pounds.) He's a big man. Can you just, for a moment, imagine what Shaq's thong must look like? You could drop it on Osama Bin Laden's cave and smother him and his cronies to death. We're talking KING THONG, here.

Hyperbole aside, I'm glad that professional sports figures have finally given us permission to fear the power of our own underwear.

Sunday, June 06, 2004

CAN YOU PICTURE THAT?

I know. People have been talking about the proposed subway photography ban for a while now. But the more I think about this, the more upset I get. There's a difference between a tourist or resident snapping a photo of something interesting in the subway (and let's face it, there's always something interesting happening in the subway) and a terrorist casing the joint for "good bomb areas."

I'm all for security, really. But there's got to be a middle ground, right? Maybe licensing is the way to go on this one. If there's a structure in place allowing for the purchase and use of guns in order to ensure public safety (background checks, waiting periods, etc), then a system to make subway photography both safe and permitted should be doable. Right?

The concept of having "press exceptions" to the ban is something I can get behind, but who's considered press? Are all of us potential members of the press? I think most bloggers would see themselves as some sort of news source, at least in some capacity. I know freelancers, who aren't beholden to one publication or another, certainly view themselves as members of the press. And what about members of the international press? Like, oh, I don't know, Al-Jazeera? Do they get a press permit, too?

I don't know about this whole thing. Seems like a limit on artistic creativity to me. And I don't like that.

AN UNEXPECTED CELEBRITY UNION

Yes, I wish Marc and Jennifer well. But her track record isn't good. And Ben's in the hospital for severe bronchitis. I take it he heard about the wedding and couldn't breathe.

Noteworthy: J. Lo kept the same wedding planner that she had for her previous wedding to dancer Cris Judd ("I Claim to Be A Celebrity, Get Me Out of Here") and the wedding she had planned for her and Ben Af. (Why not? All the work's already done...)

Also noteworthy: When I went to see SNL, Ben was the host. When I went to see The Daily Show, Ben was the guest. I even asked Jon Stewart if he thought Ben was following me. Jon thought about it, asked me what my name was, and I told him, "Esther." He said, "Esther? Um, no."

True story.

MUST BE THE AGING PROCESS

I really don't think I was always this cheesy. But with my imminent aging scheduled to occur a week from today, I guess my age is finally catching up with me, at least as far as watching TV's concerned.

For instance, earlier, I was watching Something's Gotta Give, and found myself bursting into laughter and tears as frequently as Diane Keaton did in that movie.

And now, watching the late-night episode of Buffy...the one with the senior prom. Buffy and Angel break up, we see Giles and Wesley all gussied up for the first time, and Buffy gets the "Class Protector Award." It always makes my eyes water. I'm such a sap. And then, just when the tear's getting ready to escape my eye, Wes asks Giles if he could "ask Miss Chase to dance," and Giles answers: "My God man, she's 18. And you have the emotional maturity of a blueberry scone. So just have at it, and stop fluttering about." Then Angel shows up all tuxalicious. Just for the prom. "Wild horses...couldn't drag me away..."

Oh, the good old days. When I was involved with the Angel and Buffyverse, when I had a set schedule for my TV viewing. Now I'm a flipper. Hoping for Law & Order SVU, and usually able to find it. Looking for something big, and affecting, and a little schmaltzy. (I'm not gonna lie; I do watch the occasional Cinematherapy movie on WE.)

Even though Sex & the City's coming to TBS, I still need me some new TV shows. Nip/Tuck's a-comin', as is Reno 911. But am entertaining other offers, should any of my readers have suggestions.

Thursday, June 03, 2004

MEDIA RANT

Today, I am irked by an article in the New York Times about the new Oxygen series called "Good Girls Don't..."

Infuriating title of the series aside (what is "good" and why does the title make it seem bad? Where does the ellipsis lead you? This is like that Meatloaf song "I'd Do Anything for Love (But I Won't Do That)" What won't he do? Very unclear), I have an issue with the author's description of one of the show's leads.

In comparing the show to "Absolutely Fabulous," writer Alessandra Stanley says that "the slutty roommate is also a big, fat lush." In case we thought she meant "big, fat" in the Greek wedding kind of way instead of the rotund kind of way, later, she clarifies: "There is nothing very fresh or funny about Jane, the plump, slutty and soused roommate on 'Good Girls Don't . . .'"

Why this bugs me: Jane (played by Joy Gohring) is not fat.

There's no pic of Joy in her IMDB profile , but the Times has a picture of her. So she's not super-skinny, so what? She's got boobs and hips, but last I checked, that just means she's a woman. Did anyone ever tell Kathleen Turner she was fat? Or call Susan Sarandon a slut? Pamela Anderson, Anna Nicole Smith, sure...but that's part of an image that's carefully cultivated (and surgically sculpted).

Independent of the criticism of the quality of the show itself, which may or may not be accurate, I find myself having "Doogie Howser Meets Carrie Bradshaw" moments:
* Does this mean that all women with womanly bodies are perceived as "fat" or "sluts" or both?
* Do men and women react differently to shows like this one?
* Do shows like "Good Girls Don't..." demean women, or is that charge a reaction to the depiction of women taking charge of their lives and having sex like men?
* If there were something "fresh or funny about Jane, the plump, slutty and soused roommate," would Stanley have described Jane/Joy more flatteringly? Does funny make fat/slutty ok?

Thoughts?

Wednesday, June 02, 2004

MEET MY FIANCE, GOOGLE

He knows me. Better than I know myself, he knows me. Anticipates me with every Blogspot banner; by reading words I've written, he has absorbed me. He gets me, peppering my site with links to low-carb bagels and Buffy the Vampire Slayer.

He understands my need to seek out past loves and find my closure, my final resolution on failed relationships. He encourages my ego, showing me how much the world of the Internet values me, and whether I've achieved a measure of fame or if I still wallow in a shallow pool of recognition, hoping the pool will deepen and spread to provide me with ample room to swim.

When I lack the energy to unearth my telephone directories, he comes through with the information I need, and even more. I need only to ask, and he can tell me anything.

I can think of no one better to be my life-mate, my boon companion, through thick or thin or good or bad, through the steps and missteps of life, I have finally received the answer to prayers repeatedly uttered over years of questing.

You had me at hello. Renouncing all others, I choose you.

Google, you complete me.

Tuesday, June 01, 2004

I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE JON...

In case I needed another reason to love Jon Stewart--and just to clarify, I didn't--I found the text of the commencement address he delivered last month at his alma mater, The College of William and Mary.

Now why can't I find me a boy like Jon?

The speech, complete with its unique wit, sarcasm, self-deprecation and snarky world commentary available here.